'Kami 1 Malaysia'
Animation Upin and Ipin that tells ‘Kami 1 Malaysia’ (part
1). We know that the animation Upin and Ipin it is very popular among
Malaysians. This animation is also well known overseas for its emphasis on
stories of the people of Malaysia. Therefore, our group agreed to criticize
aspects of the animation subjectivism, objectivism, emotivism and relativism. Relativism
is my choice.
The first criteria. Audience can remember animation Upin and
Ipin full after a long time compared to the animation as Kluang Man. This is
because the animation tells the story of the life experiences during childhood
playing with friends in the evening. Games made by the children are playing
war with toy guns. In addition, this animation tells the life experiences
during the Japanese. This can affect the depth because the villagers have
difficulty obtaining food such as rice, flour, chicken, vegetables, and so
forth.
The second criteria. Audience can understand the concept of
1 Malaysia from animation Upin and Ipin with full life after watching this
animation compared with Kluang Man. 1 Malaysia concept introduced by the YAB
Dato 'Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak, the Prime Minister of Malaysia. This
concept is consistent with what the Federal Constitution and the Fundamental
Principles of State. This is because the animation tells the story of various
races such as Malay, Chinese, Indian, and Christian character is used as a
child.
The third criteria. Audience can learn the animation process
Upin and Ipin after the development of digital technology used to be the easier
and faster than animation Kluang Man. Animation (2D or 3D either) can now be
generated using specific software: Adobe Flash, Zest, Toonz, Toon Boom Studio,
3D Max, and Maya.
The next step, I support subjectivism and emotivism to
evaluate an animation. As the audience can make an assessment to the
satisfaction of the audience after watching the animation. This is because,
audience can give their own views to assess the animation. Emotivism aspect,
the audience has its own emotions and can assess the animation after his watch.
Further, in terms of objectivism, audience lack evaluate after watching the
animation. This is because objectivism provide a variety of evaluation to the
audience.
In conclusion, the
audience can make an assessment in areas such as subjectivism, objectivism,
emotivism and relativism. As the audience has their own opinion and can make an
assessment of post watching the animation.
